Saturday, October 18, 2008

NYT Reporter Sends Facebook Message to Violate McCain Daughter Privacy

NYT Reporter Sends Facebook Message to Violate McCain Daughter Privacy NewsBusters.org

Talk about sleazy tactics! Wizbang has obtained a copy of a Facebook e-mail sent by New York Times reporter Jodi Kantor in order to snoop into the private life of John McCain's youngest daughter, Bridgette. Here is that Kantor message via Wizbang...

An interesting exchange

I thought this was an interesting enough exchange in the 'comments' section to warrant front page placement:

You said you would publish it if I could produce some lies told by John McCain. I did a quick search. I used Politifact and some other programs. I included only the statements that are demonstrably false, and I excluded those instances in which McCain could have misspoke or where the issue was so petty it didn't even matter. Here's what I have (and I'm sure I could compile more)

There is a BIG difference between a lie and something you disagree with. Allow me to respond point by point:

Obama's health care plan is going to fine small business...That's a lie...it doesn't

It probably will. If only Obama would define what a "small business" is. The SBA generally defines a small business as having less than 500 employees with revenues ranging anywhere from a few million to ten of millions of dollars per year.

Obama seems to classify small business as any schmuck who fills out a Schedule C at tax time.


"I have never asked for a single earmark..." Yes, McCain has a pretty good earmark record, but "never" is stretching it. He asked for $10 million for the University of Arizona and $5 million for a waste water facility. These may be good things, but they are earmarks.

While this may a bit technical and nit-picky, neither of these are 'earmarks' - and they were intentionally designed that way. These were presented as stand-alone bills for the Senate to vote up or down on. They are not allocations of money hidden in a bigger bill so that the people don't get to see what's going on. I can't imagine being more transparent than this. However, if some want to call these earmarks, I won't quibble. I simply disagree.

"I have a perfect voting record from veterans of foreign wars, American Legion and all other veterans groups." Perhaps he wasn't aware that Disabled American Vets gave him a 20%, Iraq and Afghanistan Vets of Am. gave him only 58% and even Vietnam Vets of American state he voted their way around 50 percent of the time.

I'm not sure how an organization ratings are proof of someone lying but since there are no facts here to check - who knows? Perhaps we could ask the folks that rated Obama the most liberal member of the Senate and Biden number three...
(update: had to go back and re-read this one, my bad... I'll do some homework and check on this)

He claimed to have won the majority Republican vote in NH and SC...He didn't. Ron Paul and Mitt Romney did.

You're joking right? Perhaps he mis-spoke and should have siad "plurality" but that is a very common mistake. If you think adding Romney's 32% to Paul's 8% beats McCain, then Ross Perot and Bob Dole won the popular vote in 1996. In any case, Romney and Paul STILL didn't get a "majority" when added together. A majority is 50% plus one. A plurality is the most votes - which McCain received.

We spent $223 billion on a bridge to nowhere. That's not true. The earmark for the bridge was not approved.

Wrong again, the earmark for the bridge was approved by both houses of Congress and, only later, was the earmark for the actual bridge removed - even then they still allocated the money to Alaska to use as it saw fit until it was later stripped out. Whether the money was actually "spent" depends on how you define the term but Congress most definitely approved it.

Bill Ayers and Obama ran a radical education foundation. Not true. The foundation was started by a former Reagan supporter and was certainly not radical by any stretch of the imagination. And Ayers was not an officer on the board.

There is a BIG difference between the Annenburg Foundation (started by the Reagan supporter) and the Chicago Annenburg Challenge (which received a grant from the foundation), run by Ayers and Obama and - yes - Obama WAS on the board of the CAC and - yes - he was approved as Chairman of that board by William Ayers. How do we know? Because in the documents granting the $49 million to the CAC, William Ayers is the only person who had the legal right to approve him. No one else could have done it. William Ayers received the grant appointed Barack Obama was the Chairman of the Board and President. I'm sure this is purely coincidence since Ayers is just a guy in his neighborhood. Man I wish some guy in my neighborhood wouldgive $50 million to play with...

Obama voted 94 times to raise taxes. That's not true...at least not really. The way the McCain campaign counted them it comes out to 94 times, but this includes bills that deal with multiple taxes and also includes voting against tax cuts. By the same methods used by the McCain campaign, their own candidate voted 477 times to raise taxes (true, McCain's been in the senate longer).

Messing with statistics may be sneaky politics, but it isn't a lie. If it were, most "news" organizations would have no credibility...come to think of it...

Every objective observer knows that Iran is trying to build a nuclear weapons program...if by objective he means nobody actually involved with understanding anything about Iran.

You may disagree with this statement - in which case, I most certainly disagree with you - but that doesn't make it a lie.

We must start drilling for oil to "deal with the hear and now." McCain knows as much as anyone else who is paying attention that we could start drilling for oil right now and it would take at least ten years before it influences the market. Drilling is not dealing with the hear and now.

When should we start drilling then? 10 years ago? How, exactly do we do that? And the 10-year estimate is out to lunch. It could take "up to" 10 years to reach full capacity but there most certainly would be positive results very quickly. Since solar and wind are nowhere near efficient enough yet and wont be for decades, does that mean we shouldn't do it? Using your standard - that would be the case.

It's common knowledge that Iran is training Al Qaida. It isn't. Al Qaida and Iran have conflicting religious ideologies and will not cooperate.

I would consider this more a mistake than a lie but I'll let you have it. Iran is most certainly training terrorists but they are, most likely, not al Qaida (quaeda, qaeda, whatever...) as you have pointed out. Sunni or Shia - a terrorist against the U.S. is the same.


He lied last night when he said that "vouchers work." Well, to be fair, maybe he just wasn't familiar with the research, but they don't. (to be fair, Obama supports charters, and there's no proof that they work either).

Once again, disagreeing with someone doesn't make them a liar. Vouchers absolutely DO work.

He is lying in the face of history when he claims that cutting taxes for the wealthy will stimulate growth and result in greater pay for everyone. We've been cutting taxes on the wealthy pretty consistently since Reagan and yet working Americans are no better off, and are in many ways worse off than they've ever been. McCain is either lying or is so isolated in (how many houses does he have?) his own universe that he doesn't know what is going on with working Americans.

Once again, your opinion. Where do you think all the VC money for the technology companies' development came from in the 90's? Do you think the middle class dumped their nickles in a bucket together and the companies just took off?
No, that investment money came for the uppper class (yes I said UPPER class) getting tax breaks from Reagan and investing that money in the future of our country.
It was only when people got greedy in the late 90's (yes, I said 90's!!) that these companies became overvalued and the tech bubble burst.
Whether you like it or not, "trickle down" economics works. Of course you probably think people got to be better off in the 90's because Clinton raised their taxes?
By the way, McCain doesn't own any houses. His wife is the wealthy one and he signed a pre-nup so he doesn't get any of it.

He was lying when he said that nuclear power offers "no problem." there are many problems. So many that there are almost no investors in nuclear energy unless the government is willing to subsidize huge percentages of the cost and guarantee that the companies will not be sued in the event of a NUCLEAR ACCIDENT like for instance a meltdown that kills a whole city.

Again, your opinion and, in my opinion, wrong. I have worked in nuclear power plants before and they are safer than ANY other forms of electricity production currenty in use. You are partially correct about the investors though, they are afraid of getting sued but they have no fear of ACTUAL danger from nuclear power, nor should anyone else. Meltdowns don't kill whole cities unless your shooting a Jane Fonda / Michael Douglas film. Meltdowns don't kill anybody. We have no plants like Chernobyl here and never will.People fear nuclear power because they do not understrand nuclear power.

These are lies. There are many instances where the things that McCain says are kinda sorta true in a way. By the standards that you've offered to me, those count as lies. Yet I do not include those here.

And yes, I know I could have come up with a similar list for Obama, but you are on that. I'm sure you won't let any slip. I really wish you would go to my blog. I have a write up on Obama's and McCain's honesty that I think you would like. I'm sure that I can come up with more lies from McCain. I don't know your standards for confirmation. I have a feeling they would be much lower if I were coming up with a list for Obama, but it is your blog.

Now that we're done, feel free to provide some actual lies with proof - or simply prove me wrong - I don't mind.

Complaint hits Rezko land deal

Washington Times - Complaint hits Rezko land deal

A former Illinois bank official, now claiming whistleblower status, says bank officials replaced a loan reappraisal that he prepared for a Chicago property that was purchased by the wife of now-convicted felon Tony Rezko, part of which was later sold to next-door neighbor Barack Obama.

Nothing to see here, folks. Move on. This "just a guy" in Obama's neighborhood. Probably never even spoke to him.

Never mind the fact that he purchased a piece of property that Obama couldn't afford and then sold him the usable portion of it for way less than market value.

Never mind the fact that he raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for Obama.

Never mind that Rezko has been convicted of soliciting kickbacks from companies wanting to do business with the State of Illinois (remind me, who was a state senator there?).

Never mind all of that. We've got a picture of President Bush and you can actually see Jack Abramoff in the background - he's the real criminal, your honor...

If America manages to elect this character (or lack thereof), the people that voted for him will get exactly what they deserve. The rest of us will just have to suffer along with them.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Patterico’s Pontifications » L.A. Times: Joe the Plumber Has Liens!!!!

Patterico’s Pontifications » L.A. Times: Joe the Plumber Has Liens!!!!!!

The Los Angeles Times reports:

According to court records, creditors have secured at least two liens against [Joe the Plumber] Wurzelbacher, whose legal name is Samuel. Ohio has a $1,182 lien for owed taxes and St. Charles Mercy Hospital has filed a 2007 lien for $1,261.

I think we can all agree that this is critical information.

Not because it says anything about Joe the Plumber, mind you. But it does serve a useful function: it warns any future citizen who might dare question Barack Obama that his life will be closely scrutinized for any irrelevant but embarrassing information.

So, you know. Critical in that sense.

Oh — I almost forgot to mention: Martin Nesbitt, the treasurer of Obama’s campaign, has tax liens. So do his companies.

You’d think that matters more than the tax liens of Joe the Plumber, wouldn’t you? But good luck finding a Big Media story about Nesbitt’s liens.

ACORN Voter Fraud in NM

Amanda Carpenter : ACORN Voter Fraud in NM - Townhall.com

The liberals defending ACORN's fraudulent voter registration efforts have said again and again voter registration fraud doesn't lead to voter fraud.

Well, we didn't have to wait till Election Day to find out they're wrong.

The Associated Press reported Friday that the New Mexico GOP found 28 people who voted fraudulently in Albuquerque during the June Democratic primary by absentee ballot. One of the ballots was cast from someone named "Duran-Duran"

The GOP's review was conducted in House District 13 and only included 92 ballots. That means roughly a third of the ballots examined found by the GOP were fraudulent.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Secret Service says "Kill him" allegation unfounded

Secret Service says "Kill him" allegation unfounded Wilkes-Barre breaking news timesleader.com - The Times Leader

The agent in charge of the Secret Service field office in Scranton said allegations that someone yelled “kill him” when presidential hopeful Barack Obama’s name was mentioned during Tuesday’s Sarah Palin rally are unfounded.

The Scranton Times-Tribune first reported the alleged incident on its Web site Tuesday and then again in its print edition Wednesday. The first story, written by reporter David Singleton, appeared with allegations that while congressional candidate Chris Hackett was addressing the crowd and mentioned Obama’s name a man in the audience shouted “kill him."

News organizations including ABC, The Associated Press, The Washington Monthly and MSNBC’s Countdown with Keith Olbermann reported the claim, with most attributing the allegations to the Times-Tribune story.

Agent Bill Slavoski said he was in the audience, along with an undisclosed number of additional secret service agents and other law enforcement officers and not one heard the comment.

“I was baffled,” he said after reading the report in Wednesday’s Times-Tribune.

He said the agency conducted an investigation Wednesday, after seeing the story, and could not find one person to corroborate the allegation other than Singleton.

Slavoski said more than 20 non-security agents were interviewed Wednesday, from news media to ordinary citizens in attendance at the rally for the Republican vice presidential candidate held at the Riverfront Sports Complex. He said Singleton was the only one to say he heard someone yell “kill him.”

“We have yet to find someone to back up the story,” Slavoski said. “We had people all over and we have yet to find anyone who said they heard it.”

Hackett said he did not hear the remark.

Slavoski said Singleton was interviewed Wednesday and stood by his story but couldn’t give a description of the man because he didn’t see him he only heard him.

Saturday, October 11, 2008

McCain Letter Demanded 2006 Action on Fannie and Freddie

McCain Letter Demanded 2006 Action on Fannie and Freddie - HUMAN EVENTS



Sen. John McCain's 2006 demand for regulatory action on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could have prevented current financial crisis, as HUMAN EVENTS learned from the letter shown in full text below.
McCain's letter -- signed by nineteen other senators -- said that it was "...vitally important that Congress take the necessary steps to ensure that [Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac]...operate in a safe and sound manner.[and]..More importantly, Congress must ensure that the American taxpayer is protected in the event that either...should fail."
Sen. Obama did not sign the letter, nor did any other Democrat.


Obama Campaign Involved in More Cover-Ups in ACORN Scandal | Cleveland Leader

Obama Campaign Involved in More Cover-Ups in ACORN Scandal Cleveland Leader

On Thursday we revealed the connection between Barack Obama and Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), and uncovered a 2004 article that discussed his involvement with the organization which had recently been removed from the web. Today, the cover-ups continue and language on Obama's fightthesmears.com website has been altered in order to make it look like he has been telling the truth about his ACORN associations all along.

Fortunately, we and many others online know how to do a screen capture and how to use a little something called Google Cache.

As of yesterday, Fightthesmears.com stated:

Fact: Barack was never an ACORN trainer and never worked for ACORN in any other capacity.

Sometime on Friday, the website was altered, and the text was changed to state:

Fact: ACORN never hired Obama as a trainer, organizer, or any type of employee.

The mere fact that his campaign has now changed the language of the site shows that they have conceded the fact that their original remark was a bold-face lie. As a lawyer Sen. Obama should know the importance of language.

The original statement implied that he had no working connection with ACORN, whereas the new statement now insists that he has never been employed or hired by ACORN.

It is good to see the truth finally come out now, but why were they trying to hide his association with ACORN, and what else is Obama lying to us about? Perhaps the biggest question now is how and why they got the Social Policy article stricken from most of the world wide web in the first.place. What are they trying to hide?

Friday, October 10, 2008

Local 2 Investigates Dead Voters

Local 2 Investigates Dead Voters - Local 2 Investigates News Story - KPRC Houston

The push to register voters for this year's presidential election is breaking records.

"All-in-all, a great person, a great woman, just a wonderful person" is how Alexis Guidry described her mother to Local 2 Investigates.

"As far back as I can remember, they've always voted in the election," Guidry said of her parents.

The March 2008 Primary was no exception. Voting records show Alexis' mom, Gloria Guidry, cast her ballot in person near her South Houston home.

"It was just very shocking, a little unsettling," said Alexis Guidry.

It's unsettling because Gloria Guidry died of cancer 10 months before the March Primary.

Fictitious Donors Found in Obama Finance Records - NYTimes.com

The NY Times?? THE NY TIMES??? I'm stunned. Pleased but stunned. Perhaps the Clintons have begun making their move...

Fictitious Donors Found in Obama Finance Records - NYTimes.com

Last December, someone using the name “Test Person,” from “Some Place, UT,” made a series of contributions, the largest being $764, to Senator Barack Obama’s presidential campaign totaling $2,410.07.

Someone identifying himself as “Jockim Alberton,” from 1581 Leroy Avenue in Wilmington, Del., began giving to Mr. Obama last November, contributing $10 and $25 at a time for a total of $445 through the end of February.

The only problem? There is no Leroy Avenue in Wilmington. And Jockim Alberton, who listed his employer and occupation as “Fdsa Fdsa,” does not show up in a search of public records.

An analysis of campaign finance records by The New York Times this week found nearly 3,000 donations to Mr. Obama, the Democratic nominee, from more than a dozen people with apparently fictitious donor information.

Anybody else notice??...

that oil is down over 40% since the President lifted the ban on offshore drilling? It's amazing what happens when you take action to solve a problem and stop talking about it. Now, let's get the rigs up and running.

Obama & Friends: Judge Not?

RealClearPolitics - Articles - Obama & Friends: Judge Not?

WASHINGTON -- Convicted felon Tony Rezko. Unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers. And the race-baiting Rev. Jeremiah Wright. It is hard to think of any presidential candidate before Barack Obama sporting associations with three more execrable characters. Yet let the McCain campaign raise the issue, and the mainstream media begin fulminating about dirty campaigning tinged with racism and McCarthyite guilt by association...

...McCain has only himself to blame for the bad timing. He should months ago have begun challenging Obama's associations, before the economic meltdown allowed the Obama campaign (and the mainstream media, which is to say the same thing) to dismiss the charges as an act of desperation by the trailing candidate.

Obama's Magic

RealClearPolitics - Articles - Obama's Magic

 

And now, America, we introduce the Great Obama! The world's most gifted political magician! A thing of wonder. A thing of awe. Just watch him defy politics, economics, even gravity! (And hold your applause until the end, please.)

To kick off our show tonight, Mr. Obama will give 95% of American working families a tax cut, even though 40% of Americans today don't pay income taxes! How can our star enact such mathemagic? How can he "cut" zero? Abracadabra! It's called a "refundable tax credit." It involves the federal government taking money from those who do pay taxes, and writing checks to those who don't. Yes, yes, in the real world this is known as "welfare," but please try not to ruin the show...

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Who Wrote Dreams From My Father?

This would never hold up as proof in a court of law without much more investigation.  But this guy does some very interesting analysis that strongly suggests that the un-claimed ghost writer for Obama's first book was none other than his "neighborhood acquaintance", Bill Ayers.  You know, the terrorist the Obama barely knows and never shared any ideas with...

American Thinker: Who Wrote Dreams From My Father?

...The Obama camp could put all such speculation to rest by producing some intermediary sign of impending greatness -- a school paper, an article, a notebook, his Columbia thesis, his LSAT scores -- but Obama guards these more zealously than Saddam did his nuclear secrets.  And I suspect, at the end of the day, we will pay an equally high price for Obama's concealment as Saddam's...

NUTS! - HOW ACORN GOT ME INTO VOTE SCAM

NUTS! - New York Post JEANE MacINTOSH, Post Correspondent

Christopher Barkley

Christopher Barkley

CLEVELAND - Two Ohio voters, including Domino's pizza worker Christopher Barkley , claimed yesterday that they were hounded by the community-activist group ACORN to register to vote several times, even though they made it clear they'd already signed up.

Barkley estimated he'd registered to vote "10 to 15" times after canvassers for ACORN, whose political wing has endorsed Barack Obama, relentlessly pursued him and others.

Claims such as his have sparked election officials to probe ACORN.

"I kept getting approached by folks who asked me to register," Barkley said. "They'd ask me if I was registered. I'd say yes, and they'd ask me to do it [register] again.

"Some of them were getting paid to collect names. That was their sob story, and I bought it," he said.

Barkley is one of at least three people who have been subpoenaed by the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections as part of a wider inquiry into possible voter fraud by ACORN. The group seeks to register low-income voters, who skew overwhelmingly Democratic.

"You can tell them you're registered as many times as you want - they do not care," said Lateala Goins, 21, who was subpoenaed.

"They will follow you to the buses, they will follow you home, it does not matter," she told The Post.

She added that she never put down an address on any of the registration forms, just her name.

A third subpoenaed voter, Freddie Johnson, 19, filled out registration cards 72 times over 18 months, officials said...

I'm confused. If Obama's ideas are so far superior to McCain's and everyone think Obama should be President - why do they have to cheat?

Come here...I wanna show you something.


I wanted to take a quick look back at how the polls were shaping up for George W. Bush back in 2004 against John Kerry. The graphics below come from a site that I frequently look to guage the direction of the polls. They gather several different polling organizations (Rasmuusem, Zogby, CNN, Gallup, etc.) and average things out to come up with an electoral projection.

I have chosen to display the map the showed Kerry with one if his biggest electoral leads during the 6 weeks running up to the election. This map shows Kerry getting 289 electoral votes in winning the election. In the process, it shows him taking Florida, Ohio, Iowa and a tossup in New Mexico. Kerry lost all of these states and the election. In all, at least 10 states' final results were significantly better for George W. Bush than these polls showed. Only New Hampshire, which was listed as a toss-up, went to Kerry.
















Now...look at the date of this poll average - November 1, 2004 - the DAY BEFORE THE ELECTION. Less than 24 hours before 120 million Americans went out to vote, the polling organizations had called it wrong!

This is how it ended up:
















And remember, even on election day - their exit polls were way off AGAIN!

Don't let anyone tell you what to think - just do what you need to do.

Recent Polls


Folks, I'm sure you are seeing a lot of the recent polls showing a shift towards Obama in the last week or two. Relax! There is still a lot of time before the election. The economic news of the last couple of weeks certainly played a big part in that shift since the democrats love trumpeting the bad news as "the final verdict on the failed economic policies of the last 8 years". Nevermind the fact that is was their policies that caused this mess. But I digress...
Don't let these polls get you down. They will continue to be crazy all the way up until the election.
Ask yourselves this question: Do I know anyone who has changed their mind and decided to vote for Obama in the last couple of weeks? I couldn't name a single person and I live in one of the states that they claim is shifting. If anything, I am seeing more people that are registering and voting only because they want to make sure they can vote for McCain/Palin.
Just watch over the next week or so and these polls will return to a more reasonable level. And the only one that matters is the one that's taken at tens of thousands of polling stations across the country on November 4th.


Wednesday, October 8, 2008

 
Posted by Picasa

Obama Blocked Born Alive Infant Protection Act

CitizenLink: Obama Blocked Born Alive Infant Protection Act

He often stood alone as an Illinois lawmaker in opposition to protections for babies who survived abortion.

Note: This report first appeared in the April issue of Citizen magazine.

On Jan. 10, 2005, newly elected U.S. Sen. Barack Obama visited former colleagues and staffers at the Illinois state Capitol, where he had served seven years as state senator. I happened to be at the Capitol that day, too, and a friend and I took the opportunity to speak to Obama, who had not yet achieved rock-star status and was still approachable.

We were in Springfield to lobby for passage of the state Born Alive Infant Protection Act, legislation that would require hospitals to care for infants who survive an abortion. Obama spoke against the legislation in 2001 and 2002 and single-handedly defeated it in committee in 2003.

My friend stood in Obama’s path and said, “Senator, we are going to pass Born Alive here in Illinois this year.”

Obama smiled smoothly and agreed, “I think you will,” adding, “I would have voted for the Born Alive Infant Protection Act in Illinois had it been worded the same as the federal bill. I think that’s the position the Democrats should take.”

There’s just one thing he forgot to mention: Obama had stopped his committee from adding the federal wording.

With Obama no longer in the state Senate, the Born Alive legislation passed in 2005.

First encounter

An Illinois lawmaker offered the first draft of the state’s Born Alive Infant Protection Act in 2001 after I revealed publicly that Christ Hospital left babies who survived abortion — viable babies whose delivery was induced, and whom the abortionist intended to kill but somehow survived — in a utility room to die.

...

The term “born alive,” with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or extraction from its mother of that member, at any stage of development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced abortion.

...

One night, a nursing co-worker was taking an aborted Down’s syndrome baby who was born alive to our Soiled Utility Room because his parents did not want to hold him, and she did not have time to hold him.  I could not bear the thought of this suffering child dying alone in a Soiled Utility Room, so I cradled and rocked him for the 45 minutes that he lived.  He was 21 to 22 weeks old, weighed about ½ pound, and was about 10 inches long.  He was too weak to move very much, expending any energy he had trying to breathe.  Toward the end, he was so quiet that I couldn’t tell if he was still alive unless I held him up to the light to see if his heart was still beating through his chest wall.  After he was pronounced dead, we folded his little arms across his chest, wrapped him in a tiny shroud, and carried him to the hospital morgue where all of our dead patients are taken.

...

Obama opposed Born Alive in committee, but voted “present” — neither “yes” nor “no,” but merely “present” — on the state Senate floor, one of many “present” votes that Hillary Clinton has cited as evidence that Obama lacks leadership skills. Clinton voted for the federal Born Alive bill, putting her on record as more pro-life than Obama.

When Rep. O’Malley reintroduced Born Alive and its companion bills in 2002, they headed again to the same committee, where Obama rewrote history:

"Ms. Stanek, your initial testimony last year showed your dismay at the lack of regard for human life. I agreed with you last year, and we suggested that there be a Comfort Room or something of that nature be done. The hospital acknowledged that and changes were made and you are still unimpressed. It sounds to me like you are really not interested in how these fetuses are treated, but rather not providing absolutely any medical care or life to them."

Of course, Obama had not agreed with me the year before, and I was the one who had told him about the Comfort Room, which the hospital created in response to my testimony: "We now have this prettily wallpapered room. … There is even a nice wooden rocker in the room to rock live aborted babies to death."

The hospital made live birth abortions look nicer, but the end result was still dead babies.

 “What we are doing here is to create one more burden on women, and I can’t support that,” Obama concluded, and voted “no” in committee again.

The bill went again to the Senate floor, where Obama was the sole speaker against it, claiming that it would impose a “burden” on physicians:

[T]his [legislation] puts the burden on the attending physician who has determined, since they are performing this procedure, that in fact, this is a nonviable fetus.

Troubled conscience?

Democrats won control of the state Senate in November 2002, and when Born Alive was reintroduced for the third time in 2003, it was directed to the Obama-chaired, infamously liberal Health and Human Services Committee, where he simply refused to call it for a vote.

By this time Obama was running for U.S. Senate. He won his primary in March 2004, and Republicans recruited former U.N. Ambassador Alan Keyes, who lived in Maryland, to oppose him. It was Obama’s position against Born Alive that persuaded Keyes to run, as he stated in his announcement speech:

"When I was first approached about this possibility… I have to say that my reaction was negative…. What finally caught my eye, however… what finally arrested my attention and forced me to consider whether I not only had the opportunity to oppose him, but the obligation… was when I learned that (Obama) had actually, in April 2002, apparently cast a vote that would continue to allow live birth abortions in the state of Illinois … .

"We are talking about a situation in which, in the course of an abortion procedure, a child has been born alive — is out of the womb, breathing and living on its own — and he cast a vote against the idea that we should not stand by and let that child die!"

Obama later admitted Keyes’ comment “nagged” him and has written or spoke about it several times, although he always misrepresents Keyes’ rationale as being about abortion support when it was specifically about infanticide support. In a July 2006 opinion piece in USA Today, restated later in The Audacity of Hope, Obama wrote:

If I am opposed to abortion for religious reasons but seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all.

The Home Stretch - A call to action


Okay folks, it's time to get it ramped up! Four weeks to go until election day and the race is still very close. I am certain that there will be more and more stories out there about Obama and William Ayers, Tony Rezko and a host of others coming out. The democrats will call this "swift boating". I call it bringing out the truth and not leaving your opponent the luxury of creating a good lie in response.

I, myself, will be posting stories that have more and more of an impact. Some of them are things I've resisted posting before because I was hoping not to get too serious about the election. I was hoping America would figure out who this guy is long before now. But it hasn't.

It is time that Mr. Obama come clean on Bill Ayers. It is time for Obama to provide some details on what he considers "responsible" when it comes to off-shore drilling, nuclear power, Iraq withdrawal, etc. Everything Obama is really against, he says he would do if it can be done "responsibly". We need to know what this means. It is time for Obama to own up to his votes on the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. It is time for Obama to tell America why his chief economic advisor is one of the people most largely responsible for the mortgage mess we are in. It is time for Obama to come clean on his dealings with ACORN. It is time for Obama to answer the questions about almost $200 million in unidentified campaign contributions.

To the Mad Sociologist and any other people who disagree with me - sorry. This is my blog and you've got yours. I am more than happy to debate, discuss and disagree and I actually enjoy doing so. But make no mistake - my purpose over the next four weeks is to do everything I ethically can to help get John McCain and Sarah Palin elected. This means there will be no lies posted here, but there will be plenty of questions and plenty of information that I believe people need to know.

To those on "our side": It is time for you to do your part to ensure that our country does not fall into the hands of a liberal President, liberal House and liberal Senate with two liberal Supreme Court justices about to retire. There is too much at stake.

Our party is not perfect - far from it. We have some corrupt politicians, money coming from places it shouldn't and people who put their best interests before our country's. We will deal with them. We must if we are to survive. But allowing the Democrats complete control over this mess they have helped create is not an acceptable solution.

I believe that John McCain and Sarah Palin will do whatever they can to root out this kind of crap from our government. They will not be completely successful but they will be a step in the right direction. If they step on some Republican toes to get it done - then maybe those toes need stepped on.

Your job, dear readers, is to visit here frequently and let people know about this site and other sites like it. Don't let the lies go unanswered.

Who Is Buying The White House?

IBDeditorials.com: Editorials, Political Cartoons, and Polls from Investor's Business Daily -- Who Is Buying The White House?

Sources of more than $190 million in Obama election contributions are unidentified. Will a federal investigation find foreigners illegally rigging the most important presidential election in history?

Newsmax reported last week that Sen. Barack Obama's campaign has collected "the largest pool of unidentified money that has ever flooded into the U.S. election system, before or after the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reforms of 2002."

Federal Election Commission data show that some $222 million of the cash Obama has collected came in the form of contributions of $200 or less, with the Democratic nominee's campaign identifying the donors of less than $40 million of that sum.

Campaigns may accept donations of less than $200 without providing the donors' names and addresses in campaign finance reports, but Sen. John McCain's camp has made its full donor database available on the Internet. Independent campaign finance watchdog organizations have asked the Obama campaign to list all its donors, as well, but it's refused. What is Obama hiding?

Archives prove Obama was a New Party member

 

Personally, I don't believe it.  I'm sure Mr. Obama just occasionally ran into this party in the neighborhood </sarcasm>

American Thinker Blog: Archives prove Obama was a New Party member

Obama's career bears many signs of being helped along by the radical left.  At the critical moment when he entered electoral politics, he was part of a movement to take over an established political party and direct it to the task of building a socialist America.

Last Night's Debate


For anyone looking for my analysis of last night's debate, here it is: zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

McCain did fine and got a couple of jabs in (finally) about Obama's ties to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac but the questions were no different than the last debate and all we heard, for the most part, was the same old stump speeches we've been hearing for the last 2 months.

Things will get much sharper from here on out but last night was a waste of 90 minutes of my time.


It Is Here! The Banned SNL Skit Cannot Hide From Louie

Saturday Night Live finally does a funny skit that makes fun of both sides and NBC can't stand to let it be seen.  Why is that?

View it at the site below.  The scary thing is that, even though it is hilarious, it is incredibly accurate. 

It Is Here! The Banned SNL Skit Cannot Hide From Louie

It gets put up, it gets yanked, put up, yanked.

Yank this, bitches…

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

ACORN Vegas Office Raided in Voter Fraud Investigation

 ACORN is at again...or should I say "still".  Obama will distance himself further from these guys than he will from Bill Ayers or Tony Rezko...

ACORN Vegas Office Raided in Voter Fraud Investigation - FOXNews.com Elections

Nevada state authorities seized records and computers Tuesday from the Las Vegas office of an organization that tries to get low-income people registered to vote, after fielding complaints of voter fraud.

Bob Walsh, spokesman for the Nevada secretary of state's office, told FOXNews.com the raid was prompted by ongoing complaints about "erroneous" registration information being submitted by the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, also called ACORN.